• Activ Right Brain
  • About Dean
  • Designing The Future
  • Speaker
  • Keynotes
  • Blog
  • Art
  • Contact

activrightbrain

  • Activ Right Brain
  • About Dean
  • Designing The Future
  • Speaker
  • Keynotes
  • Blog
  • Art
  • Contact

eVolution: Humanising the Future of Mobility

I’d like to introduce you to Adam. He’s in his mid thirties, single, has a physical space in an office but also travels for work and takes his digital life and enterprise with him. Adam lives in the suburbs but spends a lot of time in the city, other regional hubs and visits relatives in rural neighbourhoods.

eVolution.jpg


Adam’s pretty average, but let’s not hold that against him as he also likes gin, Guns N’ Roses and fast cars, so he has his moments!


Adam’s life is timeless, but his relationship with the car isn’t. Everything above works in a given environment – the home, the office, leisure activities. Even a decade ago, Adam could take his digital life with him as smartphones began to offer him previously unknown freedom, but the car has always been a barrier to seamless digital activity.


Ten years ago Adam marvelled at in-car connectivity via Bluetooth audio. Now he lives in a world of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto offering additional messaging, navigation and audio integration – but it’s still a ‘hands-on’ environment, where distraction is more than discouraged – it’s illegal.


Adam loves listening to music in his car from the same point he left the house or office or sidewalk or transferring Google mapping to his vehicle for navigation short cuts, but the near-future promises a whole new chapter.


When we move from semi to fully-autonomous vehicles – at least Level 4, because the self-driving story doesn’t really begin until then – we’ll enter a new world of distraction and the closest thing to a time machine since Marty and Doc scorched the tarmac in their Delorean.


It’s very easy to get hung up on the technicalities of autonomous vehicles. Sounds obvious when you’re tasked with making that happen for clients and partners, right? It’s essential, but ultimately confusing for consumers as they don’t need to understand how the magic happens, but they MUST know the tech works and how it benefits them. The essential processing happens below the skin of each vehicle, but this technology empowers us as humans to maximise our potential above the surface.


Back to Adam and his time machine. As a box-ticking exercise, autonomous vehicles will help us to work, rest and play inside the vehicle we own, lease or summon on demand, but this isn’t new. The way we’ll engage with content and activities may be – via VR or AR experiences and user interfaces, with the support of AI assistants that interact with occupants to hunt and gather information, access key functions and streamline communication.


Adam’s initial response to a self-driving car is like his view that the development of AI will result in robots taking over our lives. Intelligent tech will initially replace the humans responsible for production lines and service industries. Naturally, the reaction to this is one of concern that “we’ll all be out of a job” – but the truth is we’ll be gifted time. Time to do what humans do best – to create, love, play, empathise and ultimately interact with one another.


Autonomous vehicles too will do what they do best – reduce accidents relating to fatigue, stress, distraction and a lack of information, improve efficiency and communicate directly with each other, along with the cities and road networks they inhabit. Ironically, the unknown random factor is the human when a mixture of AI and human drivers share road space.


Adam believes Uber drivers will lose out (he’s right) and he’s worried he’ll spend even more time working or staring at a screen – he’s wrong, because he’s forgetting about the improved quality time outside a vehicle.


And this is how the time machine works. If your car knows the fastest route to any given location and where everyone else is, you’ll gain more time in your world out of the vehicle. A regular two hour car journey could include traffic congestion, refuelling, route deviation and parking. Travelling door to door (including first and last mile) on the most efficient and least congested route could shave up to 25% off Adam’s travel time. So this becomes about quality of life gained ‘outside’ the vehicle as well as the interior experience.


The technology ‘just has to work’ (no pressure!) leaving us with the human – the most important piece of the autonomous puzzle.


I read a fascinating book recently ‘The Passengers’ by John Marrs, questioning the pace of development for autonomous vehicles. It didn’t put forward a case against them, but held authorities and manufacturers accountable for the security of the ‘hackable’ vehicle operating systems and the even bigger topic – ethical selection in the event of a road accident. Should the passenger or pedestrian take priority and why? I would highly recommend everyone working in the business of mobility should read this and apply the thinking to their current and future plans for autonomy.


Adam’s typical day revolves around technology. He doesn’t regard it as tech, it’s just there unless it stops working – then he’s all too aware of it. And the more seamlessly it works the better as Adam checks the temperature of his house whilst locking his smart door, walking to his car as he listens to his favourite podcast. His audio picks up where it left off when the vehicle awakens, charged and ready to go. He knew the charge level at a glance during his shower because it sits on the home screen of his smartwatch and the car already has his destination thanks to the Google route he planned on his phone.


This technology exists and is delivered when all the dots are joined, then the car journey begins. Currently, Adam interrupts his digital potential at this stage and concentrates on driving from start to finish. Any interaction happens on a truly functional level. Soon, the totally distracted ‘Autonomous Adam’ will have access to extraordinary experiences with integrated VR headsets (and ‘VR Hair’), projected AR and multiple interactive surfaces – but that creative potential can be explored another time because it is vast and exciting, not seamless and invisible. 


So what do you do if you’re an auto brand hoping to appeal to Adam? How do you sell in the idea of a self-driving car? If Adam was 15 years younger, the chances are he’d never experience car ownership. It’s possible he wouldn’t ever touch a steering wheel – that would have been taken care of by relatives and Uber drivers. First steps into an autonomous vehicle would come naturally as there would be no real sense of loss of control or a sentimental yearning for a time when humans used to race away from the lights or ‘get the back end out’.


But Adam’s torn. He likes fast cars and loves driving, but he’s not in love with commuting or parking. He’s human and craves a relationship with a brand, a vehicle and relatable technology – and that requires a human touch.


This highlights an uncomfortable middle ground where the auto industry is moving towards digitalisation in almost every area. Online sales, virtual test drives, digital documentation and AI assistants. They all have their merits but aren’t the only future scenario, especially when introducing an audience to the concept of self-driving vehicles.


Adam – and everyone else yet to experience an autonomous journey needs first-hand demonstrations of the technology in action. Next steps beyond this will be peer-to-peer recommendation from those that have lived to drive another day following a demo. This conversion will only come from a physical experience, not a digital representation.


Tesla championed the pop-up showroom because it brought the brand to the people. Elon Musk has announced plans to close many of his physical stores and take all vehicle ordering online. This, at a time when Amazon is investing in bricks and mortar and Apple Stores go from strength to strength, may seem a bad idea. It would be for many other brands but Tesla is known for its innovation, groundbreaking technology and disruption of the market and they have a secret weapon – the Musk Factor.


Elon brings the human element to a brand in a way no other CEO has since the late Steve Jobs did for Apple. He provides the word of mouth reassurance of a friend or relative and down-to-earth language devoid of marketing spin or technological jargon, whilst injecting his vision of the future that makes us all feel part of the journey.


Before all the auto brands set off on a path to digitisation, they must win over their audiences in a physical world with personal relationships and exceptional service.


So for his first steps into the autonomous world, Adam needs reassurance, relevance and reality – but most importantly, he needs to feel human.


And as Doc Brown pointed out – where we’re going, we don’t need roads.




The original version of this article was published as ‘Autonomous Adam: A new chapter in the self-driving story’ on Arm’s Embedded blog.




tags: Mobility, Autonomous cars, autonomous driving, iot, ai, smart cities, cars, Tesla, Uber, Arm
categories: Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, Automotive, cars, Connected World, Futurology, Innovation, Mobility, Travel, time travel, Virtual Reality
Sunday 10.20.19
Posted by Dean Johnson
 

Digical: Designing Physical Magic in a Digital World

“The future is digital!” Well, yes the future does indeed contain an increasingly digitised conversation, with a growing dependency on connectivity, platforms and networks. But to neglect the physical and merely focus on digital design and production misses out one vital ingredient – the human being.

Physical Magic Digital World.jpg

I’ve thrown myself into numerous debates on the future of digital disruption, such as “VR is the future of film, TV and entertainment” – no, it’s ‘a’ future (no technological option has yet made the printed book obsolete) – they all continue to co-exist.

Speaking of books, we were convinced interactive multimedia digital experiences were the ‘future of the book’. They weren’t, as pushing certain content too far in one direction created something entirely different – a game for those not wishing to play, or an interactive movie for those simply planning to sit back and watch.

As part of my ongoing involvement in shaping the future of mobility, another heated debate rages over the subject of autonomous vehicles – “how do these things drive themselves?” “Is the technology safe?” “Will we be able to play Pokemon Go on the windscreen?” It’s my mission to inject the missing physical experience into this line of questioning.

Brands need to move consumers’ automotive expectations away from “how does it work?” to “how does it feel?” Lidar will speak to AI and AI will communicate with other vehicles, road networks and entire cities, but how will it feel to sit in a vehicle where control has been replaced by a far more important thing – choice.

I’ve had top-level conversations with global auto manufacturers about the importance of sleep, relaxation and sex in a self-driving vehicle and I’ve tested VR content, enhanced by the dynamic physical actions of a moving car. The choice of surface materials and storage solutions will become increasingly important as we’re given more time to physically interact with the environment around us and we’ll become less accepting of something that merely transports us from A to B.

Every action and instruction can be transmitted through gesture or voice, but in vehicles built for dual-driving (switchable between self and human-input) we’ll still appreciate tactile input systems such as rotary dials and switches even if some simply trade on brand history, but add strength and conviction in the process.

Part of the reason I spent 48 hours in Virtual Reality last year was to counter the argument that all VR time was wasted on a sofa watching movies or playing games. We planned as much physical activity as possible (including the wing-walk, go-kart racing, boxing and my real-world tattoo) and successfully combined physical kit with digital platforms and content.

VR48.JPG

However, Teslasuit have brought this physical element even closer to the virtual world with their full-body haptic clothing, sending electrical stimuli to muscle groups and delivering physical presence direct to digital experiences. I have been fortunate to not only test the suit with an eye to potential real-world application, adding value rather than IoT clutter, but also combine this with further wearable technology.

As much as I hate acronyms (and MR in particular), my Immersion Suit is all about the XR – (e)Xtended Reality. By taking a base layer supplied by the Teslasuit and adding bionic shoes, exoskeleton gloves, AR and VR helmets and a smattering of fireballs, I’m successfully combining the real with the hyper-real and providing a platform for digital content plus the opportunity to talk about what works, what doesn’t and what the future holds for us all.

Teslasuit.JPG

And that future doesn’t need to look ridiculous. OK, I’m not saying we’ll all be running around in Immersion Suits in ten years (or twenty), but FashTech is a real thing, as is good product design so it’s important the view we’re projecting of the future is one we don’t just think is acceptable, but actually mirrors developments in materials and manufacturing in the fashion industry.

Google failed to predict the negative brand association of Robert Scoble stood naked in a shower, wearing Glass. It wasn’t a consumer product, but it soon hit the consumer press – as did Scoble a few years later for ALL the wrong reasons.

Magic_Leap.jpg

Is Magic Leap displaying a similar naïveté (or arrogance) as images emerge of tech geeks clad in Magic Leap One headsets swamping consumer press and social channels? The technology is undoubtedly incredible (as was Glass) but no one wants to think they’ll look stupid in the future – and that’s exactly how Magic Leap pioneers are being portrayed right now.

Product design is about more than ergonomic comfort and shoehorning the right amount of tech into an acceptable space. It’s also about the look, the feel and the image. Just pick up any Apple product, hold it, balance it in your hand then ask yourself how it makes YOU feel.

Which brings us to Disney. And The Void.

“AR, not VR is the way of the future for Disney Parks.

What we create is an experience that is real.”

Bob Iger

And then Disney partnered with The Void, Lucasfilm and ILM to produce ‘Secrets of The Empire’ – the best Immersive VR experience to date. My previous benchmark was ‘Ghostbusters: Dimension’, another Void experience with Sony Pictures at Madame Tussauds in New York.

VoidPics.jpg

I’m fortunate to have been on Utah-based The Void’s journey since their early days so appreciate how far they’ve come. Their bespoke helmet design, haptic vest and weaponry fit perfectly with these immersive cinema experiences when adding blasts of air, heat, vibration and physical environments. This is transformative digital technology, genuinely transforming by offering a physical experience – not a replacement for it.

Spending a lot of time in VR (I’ve probably racked up more hours than most) it’s clear the technology is incredible, with experiences beyond our wildest dreams. But those dreams are even more magical when we share them with others in the physical world around us. Disney has perfected the art so it’s easy to see why Bob Iger views Augmented Reality as a more suitable experience for his parks than VR.

But we’ll have to wait for the AR headsets to improve before that becomes the shared experience we’re used to in a theme park environment. Poor Field of Vision (FoV), battery life and hygiene are holding back wider adoption – which leaves us with the real world.

Disney stands alone like no other collection of brands, properties, platforms and products, with a heritage to die for. But turning the spotlight on the new(ish) kids on the block, the magical world of Harry Potter is winning when it comes to contemporary physical brand extension. A ride on the Hogwarts Express or browsing every store in Diagon Alley at Universal Studios, or getting up close and personal with the costumes, props and sets at the Warner Bros Studio Tour – these are delivered to an extraordinary standard. Next steps could easily combine an AR overlay or a complete VR experience – but these physical environments already feel magical and out of this world so they must add genuine value.

Potterblock.jpg

The more I consume digital, the more I appreciate physical and the higher expectations I have of each.

Almost every industry is guilty of developing digital content without fully considering physical interaction. But the future isn’t one or the other.

This isn’t about choosing a physical OR digital solution – it’s about effectively combining the two, with a love and appreciation of each. Let’s get Digical.

tags: CES 2019, VR, AR, Mobility, Cars, self driving cars, AI, Experience design, experiential
categories: Artificial Intelligence, Automotive, cars, Connected World, Design, Futurology, Innovation, Mobile technology, Mobility, Virtual Reality, Wearable Technology
Tuesday 09.11.18
Posted by Dean Johnson
 

Designing the Future